A lot of spam is posted by unregistered users. They only have accounts on one site, and their only contribution is a spam or troll post. In my opinion, such users are not worth keeping. How about if an unregistered user's first contribution ever gets deleted as spam or offensive, the user just gets automatically deleted. This is one of such users.

Here is an example of one of such users that should be deleted/destroyed https://askubuntu.com/users/1042335/william. If you are a moderator reading this, please delete that user.

  • Even some registered spammers persist. Here's one. Availability of staff to handle cases maybe a reason. I don't fully understand this answer but you may like to read it. (I know your question is about unregistered spammers.) – DK Bose Feb 10 '20 at 3:42
  • Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/165311/… – Mark Kirby Feb 13 '20 at 10:23
  • @MarkKirby Oops, I have apparently downvoted it and I wish I hadn't. I cannot remove downvote because I am suspended on meta for using sockpuppets, but even when it is over my vote will have been locked. – user1100215 Feb 13 '20 at 15:14
  • @MarkKirby More like a cross site duplicate. – user1116846 Aug 15 '20 at 4:42

You must log in to answer this question.