This question already has an answer here:
- The audit review system - dubious posts 2 answers
In Review, I usually pass the tests when they occur.
The most common cause of failing is that I add a comment to a first-timer's question asking for clarification about what their goal was, or some such.
So then after the fail, there is no way to lodge my disagreement with the test.
Why does the review test fail as I try to comment on crappy questions in the first place?
I have no idea what those tests are for.
And when I fail one yet disagree with the decision, the learning experience is directly tied to the testing process and nothing to do with Ubuntu.
This seems very counterproductive. And just annoying enough that I sought out this
meta to say something about it.
Who decides this, anyway?