Today "suggested edits" queue suddenly increased to more than 20.

I observed the following in the edits:

  • All the edits removing only "Thanks" (there are no other improvements).

  • All are proposed by the same user.

Some examples of edit links you can find here , here and here .

I think that all the edits are done only to get reputation points.

My Question:

What would be a good choice ? Approve or Reject ?

I found similar discussions on meta (thanks to @hg8).

Why are edits removing "Thanks in advance" sometimes rejected?

Should 'Hi', 'thanks', taglines, and salutations be removed from posts?

It is not suitable to say minor since there is no mistake corrected or formatting improved.

  • 1
    @kos this might not be a dupe since it is specifically about edits that only remove "thanks", not minor edits in general. We got a whole load of those today.
    – terdon
    Commented Oct 19, 2015 at 13:29
  • @terdon I agree that maybe in this specific case simple "Thanks" removal should be rejected and edited, so yes, you've got a point there. Retracted
    – kos
    Commented Oct 19, 2015 at 13:35
  • No, actually you're asking about a very specific case, although the first link in your answer seems to answer that: "Such edits are too minor and clog up the queue."
    – kos
    Commented Oct 19, 2015 at 13:37
  • Related: meta.askubuntu.com/questions/14485/…
    – muru
    Commented Oct 20, 2015 at 7:25

1 Answer 1


Personally, I rejected all of them with the following comment:

Please don't clutter up the review queues with such minor edits. Wait until you have enough reputation to make them directly.

Minor edits that actually correct a mistake, or fix formatting or improve grammar or even typos are fine. Minor edits that simply remove thanks and leave the rest of the post untouched are just not worth it. Especially since, in many of those cases, there were other, more serious issues with the question that were not fixed.

So, yes, in my opinion, those edits should be rejected since they're not worth filling the review queues with. We can leave them to those users with enough rep to edit directly.

  • @Eliah Kagan rejects edits with typos. I try to take his attention to this post to show him, that typos fixing is normal. Typos were fixed for the next post: askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/1014858
    – Gryu
    Commented Feb 8, 2020 at 8:25
  • @gryu yes, that looks like a fine edit. I don't know why it would have been rejected. I suggest you post a new question on [META] and ask. Both reviewers are reasonable people, I'm sure they can explain.
    – terdon
    Commented Feb 8, 2020 at 13:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .