I am try to add my decisive solution to the existing answers without of any concurrency to differentiate answer set I mean.
Should to say it feels look alike some tyranny from the community and what I want to say to the Meta it is that THE QUESTION should include different ANSWERS to teach users toward their needs and moderation should not looks like mafia wars.
If people go to the community to solve their real life bugs why they should tolerate these immodest mercenary tricks!?
Look, the Meta, my Question looking really BAD and still on hold, but single Answer looking GOOD and obviously useful for community. I do not wound with these negatives and do not try to ask for policy changes alike Askubuntu's bot modifications despite the fact that is really possible and exclusive way to talk about "what is not right here". My exclusive reason to respond for a questions at Askubuntu is only reason to be useful. Thus I talk about collective automatism and an ILLUSION of users be motivated to react to common AUTHORITATIVE PRONOUNCE to decide to hold the Questions, Answers and etc.
Thank you for community negativeness however it do not change my view. Because if a community do not accept Metaphors for what the hell this META?