During the Close Votes Review there often exist two different approaches about why a question should be closed (I don't count "leave open" now).
At the end (after 5 votes to close) the majority reason "wins" - which is fine and sensible.
But: even if a reviewer voted for a different close reason (after careful deliberation) the panel beneath the question states all who voted to close as supporters of the chosen close reason.
While "the majority wins" is certainly ok (neither of us can be right at all times) I don't like "the winner takes it all" - there are cases where I know (or at least believe) that the chosen close reason is wrong.
So the feature I am requesting is that dissenting close-voters should be mentioned with "their" close reason (or without any close reason at all).