Do good quality answers on duplicate questions deserve reputation?

Question

Recently I came across a question, which was a duplicate of an already asked question here. The duplicate question had an overall negative score ( of -4), but the answers to that duplicate were upvoted (one had a score of 57 as of the time when I'm posting this question, while the top answer on the original question had a score of 18). But then, it is true that the answer was apt, acceptable and deserved upvotes.

I have two questions here, meant only for discussion, and not to criticize anybody.

1. Is it agreeable to see answers to duplicate questions getting higher scores than accepted answers to the question it was marked as a duplicate of?

2. Should the community be so hard on a duplicate question as to downvote it (I agree that the question in question was a simple case of Read the Manual, and had already been asked before), and still upvote answers to the question?

The answers to the above questions, in my opinion are:

1. The answer to the original question deserves a better treatment, as it gets seemingly less attention than the answer for the duplicate.

2. If there was no question, there would be no answer, so blaming the asker but still awarding the answerer seems kind of strange.

Your thoughts, respected community?

Answer 1

The answer to the original question deserves a better treatment, as it gets seemingly less attention than the answer for the duplicate.

I agree. That answer seems to me to have more value than any of the answers to that question. It's the only answer to either of those questions that I've upvoted.

However, that answer does not really address the question of what the a stands for in ls -a. Perhaps the question is not really a duplicate at all.

Unfortunately, short, easy-to-read answers tend to get disproportionately upvoted, while long, comprehensive answers tend to be undervalued.

However, those answers (to the duplicate) have independent value, and don't duplicate information found in the answer to the original post.

If there was no question, there would be no answer, so blaming the asker but still awarding the answerer seems kind of strange.

Again I broadly agree with you. I don't think there was anything wrong with that question. Some might argue that the question is downvoteable on the basis that it "lacks research", since the answer is given by the man page. Downvoting it because it's not a very interesting question also seems reasonable to me.

In general, asking a duplicate question might (dubiously, in my opinion) be taken to indicate a lack of research (why didn't you find this other question that has the answer already?!) but we all know the internal search... doesn't always produce helpful results, and research is very hard when you know nothing.

I try to vote based mainly on the usefulness of the post. Duplicate questions are sometimes very useful because they have valuable answers, or somewhat useful as signposts, and sometimes they do not add anything useful to the original post. This question, even if it should be considered a duplicate, is arguably somewhat useful because its answers tell us something that is not well explained by the answers to the target post, and arguably not useful, because the question of what the a in ls -a stands for is a boring question - "why did the developer of this program make this decision?"

Finally, the title of your question Do good quality answers on duplicate questions deserve reputation? suggests that you are thinking about the reputation effect of voting, which is far less important, imho, than the peer-review effect of voting. Voting is not primarily to reward the poster with reputation or penalise them by reducing their reputation, but to indicate to site users how useful a post is. So my answer is that useful posts deserve upvotes, and that may certainly apply to good quality answers to duplicate questions.

Answer 2

Questions addressing similar issues, but with slightly different symptoms may often seem like obvious duplicates to the specialists, while the tech-unsavvy (I'm one of them) may not be able to find answers without a posting mirroring exactly the issue they're facing. Thus, I find it useful that questions are linked as duplicates. Merging them might make for a more easily navigable forum, but that would also create longer questions accounting for multiple mergers, and require a lot of work from mods. As for the hierarchy between original and duplicate questions, the first aren’t necessarily the most explicit, or the best formulated. The same goes for answers to duplicates: if they’re particularly helpful in resolving the issue, it makes sense that they garner more rep points, and vice-versa. Finally, upvotes aren’t merely indicative of the intrinsic value of a question or an answer; they are dependent on the visibility/accessibility of the page, and to some extent, the mood and state of mind of the particular readers coming across said page. As such, the upvote count shouldn’t be taken as the indisputable value of a post; neither should differences in upvotes be interpreted as the final judgment by the community of one’s post.

Answer 3

I'm a fair newbie on Stack, and the whole duplicate question thing has always left me a bit confused, as like @Mukesh Sai Kumar I've consistently found better answers on the duplicates than on the original question.

This whole issue really leaves me with the question :) of:

When the duplicate question is marked duplicate, why aren't the duplicate answers automatically just moved to the original question and the duplicate's URL then auto-redirects to the original question?

Something like that would ‘fix’ the “Where’s the best answer?” problem.

Now back to Mukesh's question...

Do good quality answers on duplicate questions deserve reputation?

Yes! The key is 'good quality.' Any good quality question, or answer, deserves positive reputation.

Answer 4

In my personal opinion as a newer forum user, the question should be thoroughly be read before marking as duplicate in the first place.

In the stated situation, the question was NOT the same as the the first. A downvote is deserved for lack of research, but as previously stated, it is hard to research when you know nothing.

Votes should be decided based on whether the question asks something important, and how well the question adds to the overall value of the forum.