Timeline for "Bug reports and problems with the development version of Ubuntu should be reported on Launchpad"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2015 at 18:10 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Nov 10, 2014 at 10:31 | comment | added | TRiG | Because, as I said, it makes me want to parse the following clause as a clarifying clause, which is not the intent. Changing the or (which can be interpreted as introducing a rewording) to an and might help, in that then the commas would be simply wrong, but not confusing. | |
| Nov 9, 2014 at 12:47 | comment | added | terdon | @TRiG I'd be fine with a comma after Ubuntu as well. It might even be needed. That, however, doesn't make the first one ungrammatical. You have just repeated your claim twice without giving any reasons for it. I'm willing to be convinced but I'd need to see an argument that is more than your point of view. | |
| Nov 9, 2014 at 9:09 | comment | added | TRiG | That comma is distinctly ungrammatical. It makes me want to parse the following clause as a clarifying clause (and imagine a comma following it). | |
| Jun 4, 2014 at 7:59 | comment | added | terdon | @TRiG nothing ungrammatical about that whatsoever. You can argue that the comma is not needed but that does not make it ungrammatical and, since it increases clarity, I see nothing wrong with it at all. | |
| Jun 3, 2014 at 18:27 | comment | added | TRiG | And that comma makes the grammar wrong. | |
| Jun 3, 2014 at 13:10 | comment | added | terdon | @bain not anymore. I added a comma. | |
| Jun 3, 2014 at 13:10 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jun 3, 2014 at 13:04 | comment | added | bain | That can still be parsed as "(Bug reports or problems) with the development version of Ubuntu..." | |
| Jun 3, 2014 at 13:03 | history | answered | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |