Timeline for Please do not delete closed questions with many views and many upvotes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
May 18, 2014 at 17:36 | comment | added | Braiam | @Seth well, what I can do, I'm a prideful human. When I write content I do it with the hope that it reach the eyes of those that are really interested in what I am. | |
May 18, 2014 at 16:27 | comment | added | Seth Mod | @Braiam I have faith in you that you can come up with improvements that aren't just copy pastes. That was a silly point though. Very silly. | |
May 18, 2014 at 16:22 | comment | added | Braiam | @Seth how can I do it? Should I just dump the manual/description/features listed in somewhere else? That's worse than deleting. We have a reason to reject "plagiarized" content for these motives. An answer that is a mere dump of somewhere isn't the objective of the generality of SE and is seen as bad answers since it doesn't add anything new to the internet. Remember, leave the things better than they were, not just imitate. What you suggest me to do to improve the answers? | |
May 18, 2014 at 16:17 | comment | added | Seth Mod | @Braiam Then edit the answer! That's why it is a wiki. | |
May 18, 2014 at 16:07 | comment | added | Braiam | Have you really took a look to the answers to those questions listed in the question? Most of them are 1-2 lines long, overloaded with images. I had to downvote all the answers that said SMplayer simply because they do not make justice to the program (SMplayer being my predilect and favorite video player in Linux). Also, here there isn't locked questions, are you mixing up both sites? | |
May 18, 2014 at 16:02 | comment | added | null | @Braiam: The thing is that those aren't exactly bad content (the ones that were locked, not deleted), and have historical importance, but they aren't a good fit for a website. | |
May 18, 2014 at 15:46 | comment | added | Braiam | Why locking bad content? IMO bad content is to be deleted, no? | |
May 18, 2014 at 10:01 | history | answered | null | CC BY-SA 3.0 |