Skip to main content
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Source Link

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

Anyone that wants to help retagging these questions can use thisthis. Remember, most of these questions needs to be retagged, not just the tag deleted.

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

Anyone that wants to help retagging these questions can use this. Remember, most of these questions needs to be retagged, not just the tag deleted.

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

Anyone that wants to help retagging these questions can use this. Remember, most of these questions needs to be retagged, not just the tag deleted.

added 238 characters in body
Source Link
Braiam
  • 68.5k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 62

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

Anyone that wants to help retagging these questions can use this. Remember, most of these questions needs to be retagged, not just the tag deleted.

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

Anyone that wants to help retagging these questions can use this. Remember, most of these questions needs to be retagged, not just the tag deleted.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/465879299191349249
added 256 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Braiam
  • 68.5k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 62

Do we need the Adobe, Microsoft and Apple tags needs to be burninated?

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on neitherany of those companies, nor hasdo they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that runsrun on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

WeI don't think we need a tagtags that superseedencapsulate all those products so and. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. They need to goI think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

Adobe, Microsoft and Apple tags needs to be burninated

We don't have experts on neither of those companies nor has something to do with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that runs on Ubuntu, but those products already have their tags:

We don't need a tag that superseed all those products so and we don't have experts in the companies themself. They need to go.

Do we need the Adobe, Microsoft and Apple tags?

On Ask Ubuntu we have several companies represented as tags. There are , and . I don't think these tags are useful, and perhaps they should be removed. We don't have experts on any of those companies, nor do they have something to do with with Ubuntu/Canonical. Yes they have products that run on Ubuntu, but those products already have their own tags:

I don't think we need tags that encapsulate all those products. And we don't have experts in the companies themself. I think these tags don't really have a use. Should they go?

edited title
Link
Braiam
  • 68.5k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 62
Loading
Source Link
Braiam
  • 68.5k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 62
Loading