Timeline for Why is a question about accessing a SMB share from Nautilus assessed as OT?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2014 at 18:40 | comment | added | Seth Mod | @Braiam I'm not blindly reopening it, we don't close all the questions and only reopen them once someone has an answer. That is stupid. I see what you are saying about unclear, but without giving the OP a chance we don't close it as unclear (I'm not saying we wait for clarification, I'm saying you need to request clarification before voting to close). It was wrongly closed, and until further notice it seems to be ok, albeit requiring some clarification. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 18:37 | comment | added | Braiam | Blindly reopening questions is bad, questions shouldn't get reopened just because "it looks fine" or "the current close reason doesn't apply" it should be reopened on the basis of "can be reasonably answered?" | |
| May 5, 2014 at 18:35 | history | answered | SethMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |