Timeline for Can we have this as a canonical "answer"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
| May 13, 2014 at 16:10 | vote | accept | Venkatesh | ||
| May 5, 2014 at 16:49 | comment | added | Venkatesh | Hmm.... ok. So there might just be toooo many reasons for "Screen resolution not detected" and so its difficult to have a canonical question for that. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:41 | comment | added | Braiam | @Venki no, some of them are fine, as long as they are not used as super-mega-dump-of-any-question-that-has-keyword-and-I'm-too-lazy-to-read. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:38 | comment | added | Venkatesh | Fine. I get it. So "Having Canonical questions/answers" = "Not quite recommended" | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:30 | history | answered | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |