Skip to main content
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Source Link

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful "http"https://askubuntu.com/q/140246/169736". This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If two questions whose answers can't be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help himself instead of using carpet bombing.

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful "http://askubuntu.com/q/140246/169736". This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If two questions whose answers can't be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help himself instead of using carpet bombing.

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful "https://askubuntu.com/q/140246/169736". This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If two questions whose answers can't be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help himself instead of using carpet bombing.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/451177038893047808
added 25 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Radu Rădeanu
  • 172.4k
  • 14
  • 21

Stop Don't start to vote for closing as duplicatesduplicate for questions withwhose answers that can't be merged in the original

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful How do I resolve unmet dependencies after adding a PPA?"http://askubuntu.com/q/140246/169736". This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If it cannottwo questions whose answers can't be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help themselfhimself instead of using carpet bombing.

Stop closing as duplicates questions with answers that can't be merged in the original

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful How do I resolve unmet dependencies after adding a PPA?. This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If it cannot be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help themself instead of using carpet bombing.

Don't start to vote for closing as duplicate for questions whose answers can't be merged

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful "http://askubuntu.com/q/140246/169736". This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If two questions whose answers can't be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help himself instead of using carpet bombing.

Source Link
Braiam
  • 68.5k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 62

Stop closing as duplicates questions with answers that can't be merged in the original

I've seen this more than once. A question with a very weird dependency issue, got an answer to it's specific problem, and later on (sometimes months), someone votes to close it against the super general and unhelpful How do I resolve unmet dependencies after adding a PPA?. This wastes reviewers time and close votes that should be used against other close reasons. If it cannot be merged, is very likely they are not duplicates.

I know people know that I hate that Q with all my soul (along with others mega questions), and I will offer 5 questions about how to check dependencies issues in a way that any reader is capable to help themself instead of using carpet bombing.