Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.  

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


  

Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.  

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.  

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


 

Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.  

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.

 

Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate. 

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


  

Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer. 

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate.

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.


 

Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer.

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

From my part (since it was I who did this), you had answered the question already on the duplicate. 

Since you effectively had recognised that the question was a duplicate and had correctly answered on the correct question, my role was simple - to play the janitor and thus cleanup by removing the answer.

There was no reason to merge here since you had already answered the question.

 

Most traffic to Stack Exchange sites is via search engines. To redirect users to the correct question, Stack Exchange uses the policy of redirection as explained here:

Now ordinarily I would normally leave questions and answers alone unless they start to receive high traffic (visits). In this case, you had answered the question on the duplicate - thus leaving two answers on separate questions would have been nonsensical - you potentially would be benefiting twice with the same answer. 

Hence the janitorial rule here applies - cleanup and move on to find similar stuff to tidy up.

added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Seth Mod
  • 58.9k
  • 3
  • 47
  • 73
Loading
added 747 characters in body
Source Link
fossfreedom Mod
  • 173.9k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 39
Loading
Source Link
fossfreedom Mod
  • 173.9k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 39
Loading