Timeline for Why do people post screenshots of their terminals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2021 at 3:16 | comment | added | j0h | it looks dope, like im a hacker in the matrix | |
| Jun 23, 2018 at 17:12 | comment | added | Nonny Moose | You can copy and paste it with Project Naptha ;) | |
| Jan 31, 2017 at 15:07 | answer | added | David Foerster | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 0:31 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Aug 3, 2015 at 15:05 | comment | added | kasperd | Transparent terminals is another good reason to avoid posting screenshots of your terminal. Users don't always realize what information they are leaking that way. Last week I saw a posting with a screenshot of a transparent terminal in front of a list of usernames and passwords. | |
| May 22, 2014 at 1:26 | comment | added | terdon | @DKBose I just saw this post by a blind user on meta.SO which is a good example of why we should avoid images: Alt Text on Several Graphics. | |
| Mar 26, 2014 at 15:34 | history | edited | Braiam |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 13, 2014 at 13:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/444106132110733312 | ||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 20:58 | comment | added | Mateo | The accepted answer will be on top ;) , And it should read the vote count, plus it should read the "accept" as if I use a "high contrast" user css theme I see this - i.sstatic.net/WPitD.png - so it would be read to you. plus you can disable the tables and everything follows top to bottom | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 18:24 | vote | accept | terdon | ||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 18:24 | comment | added | terdon | @DKBose I honestly have no idea. All I'm saying is that it might be another reason to avoid unnecessary images. | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 18:21 | comment | added | DK Bose | So will text-to-speech pick up whether an answer is accepted? I don't know. I imagine it won't. The complexity of this site implies very heavy reliance on visual cues. | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 18:03 | comment | added | terdon | @DKBose not necessarily, no. Text-to-speech software should be able to pick up most of it. I am lucky enough to not need it so I don't know the details but why make it harder than necessary? | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 17:59 | comment | added | DK Bose | Re. people who have sight problems and are maybe accessing the site using text-to-speech software, won't most of any SE site be "accessibility" unfriendly? | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 17:45 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2014 at 17:19 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 33 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 17:09 | history | asked | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
