Timeline for Am I penalized for trying to "improve" a test edit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:32 | comment | added | Seth Mod | @Amanda Clicking improve should really only be done when you actually intend to improve the edit. If you want to see the entire question you can click on the title, or look at the markdown view. | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 0:36 | comment | added | Braiam | @Amanda check my edit | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 0:36 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 412 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2014 at 23:48 | comment | added | Amanda | I agree. The edit was pure crap. But "improve" is the only way to see the full edited post. The original question was so thin I thought maybe seeing it in context would explain what the edit was getting at. I just don't think I should be penalized for looking at the edit in the context of the full post, which is very different from approving the edit. | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 23:00 | history | answered | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |