Timeline for Am I penalized for trying to "improve" a test edit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 at 18:51 | history | edited | Amanda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo fix
|
| Jun 20, 2014 at 14:43 | comment | added | Elder Geek | The system has taught me to accept a blatantly duplicated answer as perfectly acceptable when working through the first posts review queue. Brilliant. | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 23:00 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 11:37 | comment | added | guntbert | Still, the audits don't work the way they are supposed to do: they should catch us when we "don't pay attention" not when we work carefully - at least that's what the wording implies. | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 22:01 | comment | added | Braiam | Please note, that failing an audit once in a while is not bad. Next time with similar edits, just reject them. | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 21:56 | history | asked | Amanda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |