Timeline for Can we delete/migrate 425730 question that is about Mint?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2014 at 13:39 | comment | added | Braiam | I don't care anymore... you guys don't understand that being helpful doesn't mean that we can't close/delete questions. The most upvoted answer and my question essentially says the same yet nobody has flagged the question for migration. If nobody is going to migrate it I'm voting to delete it. You want the question somewhere, JUST FREAKING FLAG IT ALREADY! | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 9:05 | comment | added | LiveWireBT | @Braiam Please tell me what the results of these discussions were from your point of view! You want to remove a perfectly answered and accepted question (that's quite contradicting) and you encourage users to act destructive. Which is awfully inefficient, but I guess that's how you have to do things if you don't want to be disturbed by others during "cleaning the house". If your activity at SE is as beneficial as you like to pretend, you should already know better. But it more and more appears as an obsession that is not particularly beneficial and that's why you do this all by yourself. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 8:11 | history | edited | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2014 at 2:44 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | "a simple synthax error" I see what you did there! | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 1:13 | comment | added | Braiam | 66% answered, most of high reputation guys are unactive, want me to tell you what FEIchinger already said? Please, drop the impression that closing and deleting is bad. Is just cleaning up the house. If we don't things will get worse. In what way should I put it so it's understandable enough? | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 0:26 | comment | added | LiveWireBT | @Braiam Things will get worse? At wich rate? Will we see more users kindly answering more questions about Mint tomorrow? Sounds great to me! As you're very busy with relabeling everything we would then just need another instance for Mint and move them all over there. Just solved your problem with non-destructive logic. | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 0:25 | history | edited | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 81 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2014 at 23:56 | comment | added | Braiam | how much we have to handle things gracefully? That doesn't work! The current state of affairs was because we are not fast/aggressive enough. Closing the question will tell OP where to get help, point. That's as far we should go. We are in the point of "if we don't do something and fast things will get worse and worse". | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 23:53 | comment | added | LiveWireBT | Calm down, take a week off, think things over. AU will still be here in a week. What part of handle things gracefully did you not understand? If you can't, let someone else take over. Are you even aware that this site is not a one man show? | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 23:45 | comment | added | Braiam | No, if you allow a single Mint question, what prevent us from accepting Debian's, Arch, Red Hat's? It is off topic, close it, migrate it and delete it, just that in AU isn't the place to ask about those distros and we should be firm about it. The problem doesn't matter but the philosophy is at stakes here. | |
| Mar 5, 2014 at 23:34 | history | answered | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |