Timeline for When is an edit too minor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2020 at 22:46 | comment | added | Felipe G. M. Maia | If the text edited became better, it is relevant and should be accepted. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 22:05 | comment | added | belacqua | Also, you can only get a max of of 1000 rep ever from edits, and you stop getting +2 once you hit 2000 rep I think(?) (at that point that you have carte blanche editing powers). | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 21:39 | comment | added | don.joey | @belacqua I agree that if you have only ten seconds to do an edit and you see a mistake in a title, that you should correct it. You just might not get the +2 rep for doing so, but that is not an issue I think. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 19:05 | comment | added | belacqua | Your method is probably best (or perhaps "ideal"). I'm just a little OCD with titles, as they appear prominently in the question lists and searches. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 8:05 | comment | added | don.joey | @belacqua in that case, I choose improve and might (or might not) mark the edit as useful. If I've had to spend more than 60 seconds or so editing it, then the edit is too minor for me and I will mark it as not useful. | |
| Feb 28, 2014 at 6:37 | comment | added | belacqua | I mostly agree, except that I have no problem with someone fixing say, a huge typo in the title, but leaving capitalization problems in the body, or something similar. | |
| Feb 23, 2014 at 21:02 | history | answered | don.joey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |