Timeline for When is an edit too minor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 3, 2014 at 13:24 | vote | accept | Amanda | ||
| Feb 28, 2014 at 13:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/439394848949673985 | ||
| Feb 23, 2014 at 21:02 | answer | added | don.joey | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 19:28 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | I usually accept almost every edit as long as it's improving the quality of a post. "How to remove an installed packages" is a minor edit, but it's the title of the question and I am sure someone just couldn't idly sit by and let that typo slide. | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 18:12 | answer | added | jobin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 18, 2014 at 0:33 | comment | added | DK Bose | Re. the first example, the title originally was "Why is Ubuntu.com in Chinese for me?" which was not reflecting the question iteslf because the entire site wasn't in Chinese, just specific parts. So I inserted "partially" to reflect that. Is that trivial? And, yes, I also want to get rep. How is that wrong? | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 22:06 | comment | added | Lynob | dont tell anyone, i know someone running for mod, doing stupid edits to get rep as you say, he edited my question, I declined it and wanted to slap him in the face too. I don't care so much about it anymore, high rep users answering dupes and EOL to get rep, this site is a mess, if the high rep users do what they do, why should I care | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 21:01 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Feb 17, 2014 at 20:04 | history | asked | Amanda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |