I see a decent number of edits in the queue that feel like someone is trying to get rep rather than trying to improve the site. Some examples:

• http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/223751 -- The question isn't more clear than it was before.

• http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/222360 -- the edit did fix a typo in the title, but it is an awfully minor edit.

• http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/221480 -- adding paragraph breaks makes it more readable, but the bulk of the edit is case changes (wifi to WiFi) and Americanization ("neighbour" to "neighbor").

Some I approved, some I rejected. If a minor edit does make formatting/spelling errors less distracting, makes the site more readable, should I just accept it?

I see a decent number of edits in the queue that feel like someone is trying to get rep rather than trying to improve the site. Some examples:

• https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/223751 -- The question isn't more clear than it was before.

• https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/222360 -- the edit did fix a typo in the title, but it is an awfully minor edit.

• https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/221480 -- adding paragraph breaks makes it more readable, but the bulk of the edit is case changes (wifi to WiFi) and Americanization ("neighbour" to "neighbor").

Some I approved, some I rejected. If a minor edit does make formatting/spelling errors less distracting, makes the site more readable, should I just accept it?