Timeline for Initial votes to close a question (especially concerning bugs) - some need explanation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Feb 1, 2014 at 11:52 | history | edited | guntbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 458 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2014 at 18:47 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 17:47 | comment | added | Braiam | BTW, I don't think anyone should explain their close votes if the question is obviously outside the scope of AU. What we should do is close them fast™ so OP gets awareness. | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 17:34 | comment | added | Braiam | Exactly which questions? I can't see anything that you left open in the review queue that was being closed as bug. | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 17:11 | comment | added | Oli Mod |
Additionally, if it's something the OP can remedy, a comment gives them a notification so they can get on and do something to fix it. They might also not recognise what the close (2) in their bar means. Good communication will save everybody a lot of blood, toil, tears and sweat.
|
|
| Jan 31, 2014 at 16:54 | history | asked | guntbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |