Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

###No,

No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer hereanswer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared herehere which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff AtwoodJeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

###No,

Showing upvote/downvote counts by default was declined for performance reasons (performing twice the amount of database queries).

To quote Jeff Atwood's answer here:

The total vote count (score) is denormalized, but the individual up/down vote counts are not.

So to display it on every post would incur 2 vote table queries * number of visible questions / answers. Our DB is fast, but the vote table is pretty massive, and not doing a query is always faster than doing it.


If you really want/need this, a userscript has been shared here which auto-clicks the vote counts once each second to get the totals.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link
Loading
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
kiri
  • 28.7k
  • 13
  • 21
Loading