Timeline for Downvoting answers (or questions) without a reason? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 at 15:42 | comment | added | Oli Mod | FWIW, I'm with you.... I've campaigned for anonymous downvote reasons (like close reasons)... But whenever it's suggested, it's bombarded with downvotes... meta.stackexchange.com/questions/144851/… (that's +44/-22) It's pretty controversial and that suggestion is for optional feedback. | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 20:48 | history | closed |
NickTux Mateo guntbert Braiam Eric Carvalho |
Duplicate of Down voting consequences, Can we have a feature where downvoting is only possible if the user has left a comment or filled out a form? [duplicate] | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 13:10 | comment | added | NickTux | @falconer the comment doesn't reveal the downvoter. What if I downvote your answer and I write as a comment "very helpful indeed" :P . The revealed reason, a true reason would be helpful for improvement. A simple downvote is not always clear. And I said on an other comment, in main AU is not a matter (or it shouldn't) of opinion. It's about correct/helpful answers and false/dangerous/unhelpful posts, or answers that an improvement is needed. Anyway, there is no matter to discuss it more. This is already a duplicate, the decisions are already made.. :) | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 13:04 | comment | added | falconer | @NikTh Secret voting means the reasons are secret too, or the voting won't be a secret anymore. And if a someone downvotes and gives a reason, who would decide that that reason is fair? Another voting on that subject? | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 12:58 | comment | added | NickTux | @falconer and it's a bad thing to reveal the reason? It's something that is secret? I didn't speak about idiots (you said that), I spoke about lightly or in some cases irresponsible downvoting. | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 12:18 | comment | added | falconer | Why do you think that a downvote is without reason? How could you know? Don't forget that downvoting needs minimum 125 rep, so the voters are not some idiots, and the downvoter also lose 1 reputation if he downvotes. Actually I think there are less downvotes on the site than it is needed. | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 4:16 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 5, 2014 at 20:48 | |||||
| Jan 5, 2014 at 3:59 | comment | added | NickTux | Ok, fair enough. Lets mark it as such then. Sorry about the... quadruplicate :-P | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 3:55 | comment | added | Seth | Well for starters: meta.askubuntu.com/questions/2635/… and meta.askubuntu.com/questions/7463/… and meta.askubuntu.com/questions/2008/down-voting-consequences and TONS more on Meta Stack Exchange. | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 3:40 | comment | added | NickTux | @Seth I couldn't find the duplicate. Please mark it as duplicate if that so. | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 3:38 | comment | added | Seth | This has been addressed so, so many times. Do we really have to go over it again? | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 3:26 | history | edited | NickTux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
| Jan 5, 2014 at 2:52 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 2:51 | answer | added | RPiAwesomeness | timeline score: -5 | |
| Jan 5, 2014 at 2:38 | history | asked | NickTux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |