Timeline for to the closers of 377087, which has an excellent answer
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jan 1, 2014 at 0:53 | history | edited | kiri |
added tag
|
|
| Dec 31, 2013 at 20:49 | comment | added | Braiam | @Seth the problem is not the dependencies issues, but the installation of a package. | |
| Dec 31, 2013 at 19:58 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 31, 2013 at 19:45 | comment | added | Seth | Just because it has an answer doesn't make it unclosable. I don't see where Braiam's answer was anything super "new" that wasn't addressed in the canonical question. No harm was done to anyone in this closing, so what's the big issue? The whole point of duplicate closures is to prevent huge messes of questions with the same problem. Doesn't mean you can't give good answers to duplicate questions (before they get closed of course). | |
| Dec 31, 2013 at 18:40 | answer | added | Aditya | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 31, 2013 at 16:58 | history | asked | djeikyb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |