Timeline for Deprecate the ubuntu-desktop tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2010 at 16:20 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | I agree too, it wasn't obvious to me until it was pointed out in the blog but it makes total sense. Moving from ubuntu-server to just "server" would be a nice too. | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 16:17 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | In my mind -server questions should be here if they're small "I run a samba machine at home" type things, and serverfault for pros that run machines for others (ie. sysadmins). | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 11:16 | comment | added | 8128 | Completely removing server questions (and even the tagging of such questions) seems beyond the scope of this particular discussion (though I note that 4% of the questions here are tagged server) | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 8:23 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | if anything you should tag server questions [server] to differentiate them and assume most questions are about desktop. Beyond that, I don't know how different Ubuntu Server and Ubuntu Desktop are in practice.. and what's so very very specific about Ubuntu Server that means you can't ask about it on, say serverfault.com ? | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 8:20 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | I agree 100%, if the tag doesn't add anything, or worse if it is a meta-tag -- it should not be used. | |
| Dec 18, 2010 at 8:11 | history | answered | 8128 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |