Timeline for "Review completed": why isn't the fate of that post decided?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Aug 29, 2013 at 12:26 | comment | added | Braiam | @guntbert ok, seems that this answer is in the right track meta.stackexchange.com/a/161482/213575 the interesting part is: I think that is fairly obvious that it is the same as saying it *"looks good", after all If you have fixed everything wrong with the post, then why would you still consider it low quality? | |
| Aug 29, 2013 at 12:23 | comment | added | Braiam | @guntbert no, the times don't match for that conclusion. My hunch is, that a single "Looks good" remove the post from the LQ queue. I scrapped the entire MSO for answers, but couldn't find anything that confirms my hunch about this behavior. You should create a meta-post in Meta Stackoverflow with the support tag asking to explain this behavior. | |
| Aug 29, 2013 at 11:49 | comment | added | guntbert | You are convincing me that I was looking at the juncture of two review queues: The "low quality" queue - which I showed in my question and which was completed with the first "Looks Good" vote and the "close" queue which resulted in closing the question as "unclear what you are asking". | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 23:22 | comment | added | Braiam | @guntbert see my update, this is a guess, but seems just right. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 23:21 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 96 characters in body
|
| Aug 28, 2013 at 23:20 | history | undeleted | Braiam | ||
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:28 | history | deleted | Braiam | via Vote | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:21 | history | undeleted | Braiam | ||
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:21 | history | deleted | Braiam | via Vote | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:14 | comment | added | guntbert | @Braiam do you know this or guess - mind you the tag I used was "bug" and not "discussion". | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:09 | comment | added | guntbert | @Braiam unsuccessful again, sorry, the question in question still exists. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:07 | comment | added | Braiam | @guntbert I'm never wrong! Just that I don't have the answer at the moment :P | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:06 | history | edited | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 212 characters in body
|
| Aug 28, 2013 at 21:00 | comment | added | guntbert | @Braiam not correct, see the screenshot in my question. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 20:57 | comment | added | Seth | That's not what it is saying however, see i.imgur.com/Hawx7rG.png What it is saying is, this review is over and cannot be reviewed anymore. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 20:53 | comment | added | Seth | He's asking why the review says "completed" when one more vote is needed. | |
| Aug 28, 2013 at 20:52 | history | answered | Braiam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
