Skip to main content
replaced http://drupal.stackexchange.com/ with https://drupal.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I keep bumping into questions with perfectly good answers that are not marked as accepted or can't even be marked nor voted because they're in comments. Even if you politely ask the "commentswerer" to move his solution from comments to answers they deny any rep being awarded for their help in an equally politely mannerthey deny any rep being awarded for their help in an equally politely manner (Hence "rep shy")

I keep bumping into questions with perfectly good answers that are not marked as accepted or can't even be marked nor voted because they're in comments. Even if you politely ask the "commentswerer" to move his solution from comments to answers they deny any rep being awarded for their help in an equally politely manner (Hence "rep shy")

I keep bumping into questions with perfectly good answers that are not marked as accepted or can't even be marked nor voted because they're in comments. Even if you politely ask the "commentswerer" to move his solution from comments to answers they deny any rep being awarded for their help in an equally politely manner (Hence "rep shy")

replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Source Link

Now, I know "Accepting doesn't mean it's the best answer, it just means that it worked for the person who asked" as stated in the about pagethe about page and the help documentation (right here)help documentation (right here).

Even if that user finds a question with the same issue he/she hasfinds a question with the same issue he/she has and enters to try and participate with the hope to bring the question back to life, will find out that because of having little or no rep he/she won't be able to comment nor upvote on a question that's been dead for months in order to remind someone that he/she shares this problem and needs an answer, also making it a favorite wont do any good, so this new user will have to post a new (duplicated) questionwill have to post a new (duplicated) question.

Now, I know "Accepting doesn't mean it's the best answer, it just means that it worked for the person who asked" as stated in the about page and the help documentation (right here).

Even if that user finds a question with the same issue he/she has and enters to try and participate with the hope to bring the question back to life, will find out that because of having little or no rep he/she won't be able to comment nor upvote on a question that's been dead for months in order to remind someone that he/she shares this problem and needs an answer, also making it a favorite wont do any good, so this new user will have to post a new (duplicated) question.

Now, I know "Accepting doesn't mean it's the best answer, it just means that it worked for the person who asked" as stated in the about page and the help documentation (right here).

Even if that user finds a question with the same issue he/she has and enters to try and participate with the hope to bring the question back to life, will find out that because of having little or no rep he/she won't be able to comment nor upvote on a question that's been dead for months in order to remind someone that he/she shares this problem and needs an answer, also making it a favorite wont do any good, so this new user will have to post a new (duplicated) question.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

So I'd debate Jeff Atwood on his posture towards this issueJeff Atwood on his posture towards this issue This "50rep for comments" he defends is problematic as described above.

So I'd debate Jeff Atwood on his posture towards this issue This "50rep for comments" he defends is problematic as described above.

So I'd debate Jeff Atwood on his posture towards this issue This "50rep for comments" he defends is problematic as described above.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link
Loading
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
removed unnecessary edits
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
added 797 characters in body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
added 11 characters in body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
added 234 characters in body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
better explained the case scenario
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
corrected duplicated answer for duplicated question, my bad
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
edited body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
edited title
Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
edited body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading
Source Link
JorgeArtware
  • 3.6k
  • 11
  • 6
Loading