Timeline for McAfee Site Advisor indicates that this site is risky to visit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2013 at 20:20 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/357595769907322882 | ||
| Jul 15, 2013 at 11:07 | comment | added | jobukkit | @cambraca It will probably cause newbies to think Ubuntu is malware. | |
| Jul 14, 2013 at 22:28 | answer | added | santoshbalram | timeline score: -4 | |
| Jul 13, 2013 at 5:56 | vote | accept | mdpc | ||
| Jul 12, 2013 at 23:00 | answer | added | Tachyons | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 20:53 | answer | added | Mateo | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 17:13 | comment | added | belacqua | FWIW, Cisco Ironport and Palo Alto don't have any problems with askubuntu sites.... | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 15:37 | comment | added | cambraca | Just uninstall it. [nsfw] | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 15:13 | answer | added | JaydlesStaff | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jul 12, 2013 at 13:06 | comment | added | Zignd | There is probably Mrs. Bill Gates touch on it. | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 21:30 | comment | added | Seth | Wat.. trusting McAfee are we? O_o | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 16:52 | comment | added | Oli Mod | I don't think there is an actual problem issue though. Both Google and Symantec think we're good boys and girls. I suspect somebody may have maliciously filed a report against the site on SiteAdvisor but that is speculation. It could be that some of the spam that occasionally rocks up here (and lasts for a few minutes before it's deleted) has been spotted. | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 16:48 | comment | added | Oli Mod | Thanks for pointing it out. I have requested they review their decision and I'll poke people further up the SE chain to try and get a proper answer on why they've ranked us so poorly (I can't see it on the site report). | |
| Jul 11, 2013 at 16:44 | history | asked | mdpc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |