Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I take issue with the last one:

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concernsResponding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

I take issue with the last one:

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

I take issue with the last one:

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

I take issue with the last one:

  

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.  

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.  

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

I take issue with the last one:

 

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.  

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.  

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

I take issue with the last one:

 

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link

I take issue with the last one:

  

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers. 

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users. 

This is currently being discussed in http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/185102/responding-to-your-too-localized-concernsResponding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

I take issue with the last one:

 

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers.

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users.

This is currently being discussed in http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/185102/responding-to-your-too-localized-concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

I take issue with the last one:

 

You have described a problem that can't be reproduced that seemingly went away on its own or was only relevant to a very specific period of time. It's off-topic as it's unlikely to help future readers. 

Questions that can no longer be reproduced aren't really off-topic. I know that's the way the folks at SE want us to close them, but to me that makes no sense and will only confuse users. 

This is currently being discussed in Responding to your "too localized" concerns over on MSO.

The other reasons look great!

Source Link
Seth
  • 58.9k
  • 3
  • 47
  • 73
Loading