Timeline for Can we have more than 3 custom close reasons, pretty please?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jul 8, 2013 at 10:27 | comment | added | Mark Booth | @Seth - It's not a matter of trust, it's a matter making sure that everyone thinks all of the reasons are important enough to go beyond the norm and ensuring buy-in. On robotics we ended up combining two very similar close reasons into a single multi-part close reason and discarding the suggested shopping question close reason because it is now effectively covered by the standard primarily opinion-based close reason. This is something which needs to be hashed out on a sites meta, which I see you are already doing. | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 10:19 | history | edited | Mark Booth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarify the history of this answer.
|
| Jul 7, 2013 at 20:06 | comment | added | Seth | Why? You don't trust the moderators? They're supposed to talk this stuff over anyway.. | |
| Jul 6, 2013 at 23:46 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jul 6, 2013 at 23:39 | history | answered | Mark Booth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |