Timeline for Should reputation be reduced over time, when a user is inactive?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2013 at 8:32 | history | edited | Bruno PereiraMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2013 at 14:41 | comment | added | NickTux | Is not your opinion only. See the positive votes to your answer. See the negative votes to mine. :-) «Rainbow in the morning gives you a fair warning» haha. | |
| Jun 5, 2013 at 11:43 | comment | added | Bruno Pereira Mod | Hey, that is just my opinion (when did anyone started listening to any thing I say?) Don't quit so fast. | |
| Jun 5, 2013 at 9:07 | vote | accept | NickTux | ||
| Jun 5, 2013 at 9:07 | comment | added | NickTux | Ok. Let it be then. | |
| Jun 5, 2013 at 8:23 | comment | added | Bruno Pereira Mod |
I would say that in a site as Launchpad, time is of the essence, reports need to be sorted, bugs solved, translations done in time, etc. Here we are not bounded by that obligation idea. Maybe karma in launchpad is justifiable, here not, I don´t see it like that.
|
|
| Jun 5, 2013 at 1:27 | comment | added | NickTux | Oh, also I'm not payed in Launchpad Answers either but this rule applies. About the "why should you reward", the reputation and badges, what are they ? Are not a "reward" ? This is the actual web(in general) "payment" to users who contribute. | |
| Jun 5, 2013 at 1:14 | comment | added | NickTux | Hahaha... Ok. It was just a thought. Taking Launchpad Answers as an example, I thought maybe we can do the same here. For the best, not the worst. | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 20:33 | history | answered | Bruno PereiraMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |