Timeline for Is it acceptable for users to only gain reputation through a plethora of tiny edits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2013 at 16:16 | history | edited | Seth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| May 5, 2013 at 15:51 | comment | added | Luis Alvarado Mod | @radu No problem Jacques Fresco, am rooting for your cause (Yeah, your avatar STILL looks like him ^^). | |
| May 5, 2013 at 15:39 | comment | added | Radu Rădeanu | @Luis Alvarado Thank you for your considerations and for sustaining me :) In the future I will try to take into account what has been said here, to fit better and do not seem to be like an intruder | |
| May 5, 2013 at 13:37 | comment | added | Luis Alvarado Mod | @WarrenHill same thinking. If I see several corrections, even if minor, I'll accept. | |
| May 5, 2013 at 12:07 | comment | added | Warren Hill | Things like correct spelling, capitalisation and punctuation may seem "too minor" to some. However it does improve readability. I have made edits in the past where the only changes have been capitalisation and punctuation. I wouldn't do it for one letter but if a question or answer is littered with such errors I believe the posts are improved by the edit. | |
| May 4, 2013 at 21:16 | history | edited | guntbert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo fixed
|
| May 4, 2013 at 20:48 | history | answered | Luis AlvaradoMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |