People get closed posts wrong.
Closing a posts means that either there is no quality in it enough to meet the site's standards, or simply its a useless question (either a dupe, or really not a post per se).
That is an opportunity to actually improve the post, should be taken as one and its meant to be taken as such.
No comments? What do you mean? There is a big obvious one already:
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.
Is that not enough? What would adding an extra comment add to explaining why that question was closed? Redundancy?
Closing is making better, its not by all means punishing anyone, should not be taken as such.
Do you think it deserves a comment and further investigation of what issue the OP is facing? Go ahead: closed posts can be commented on, information can be obtained, post can be edited, flagged, re-opened.
##No issues, no fuzz. Comment, edit, help.
No issues, no fuzz. Comment, edit, help.
That post, as it is, is closed for a good reason. If you can improve it make it so.
