Timeline for Do we promote "collection" wikis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 8:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Oct 25, 2010 at 8:39 | comment | added | 8128 | My discussion with Roger was continued in chat and as a result I reverted the question to an earlier revision. | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 7:59 | comment | added | Roger Pate | @fluteflute: I understand the implied question (but the actual question body is poorly edited) to be along the lines of "what widgets should I use to promote Ubuntu on my website", which is subjective. Ask Ubuntu is not an encyclopedia to collect lists and without that implied question, it's not even a question at all. | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 7:54 | comment | added | 8128 | The subjective question guidelines are only for subjective questions though. Either an answer is a "widget to promote Ubuntu on your website" or it is not - nothing subjective there (in my opinion). | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 7:51 | comment | added | Roger Pate | @fluteflute: It fails subjective question guidelines 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6. (Linked in the FAQ.) | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 7:48 | comment | added | 8128 | I agree with you on everything except the fact that the "Widgets" question is a discussion question. There's a clear answerable question there, which I think should be allowed on the site. | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 7:42 | comment | added | Roger Pate | @fluteflute: They're both discussion lists rather than questions, though one is phrased better than another. — Discussion is great, but it's not Q&A. | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 7:10 | comment | added | 8128 | I see that second question as fundamentally different to what we're talking about. The "hot" one is just a completely unanswerable question that I think was right to have been closed. On the other hand, the "Widgets" question was a perfectly valid question, the issue up for discussion in this "meta question" is the request everyone edited their answers into a single post. | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 6:46 | history | edited | Roger Pate | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2010 at 22:06 | comment | added | Roger Pate | Another example of such a question: askubuntu.com/questions/9237/hot-features-of-ubuntu-closed | |
| Oct 24, 2010 at 0:25 | history | edited | Roger Pate | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 43 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2010 at 0:20 | history | edited | Roger Pate | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 145 characters in body; added 155 characters in body; added 81 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2010 at 0:13 | history | answered | Roger Pate | CC BY-SA 2.5 |