Timeline for Should duplicates be merged into the newer or older question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:57 | comment | added | Tom Brossman | @LewisGoddard Older or newer should make no difference here. All content is published under a Creative Commons licence, so you have already accepted that your contributions will be remixed/edited/etc. How exactly this gets carried out is left to the moderators (who we voted for). They make their own subjective decisions about what to do. Does that help explain it better? If no, you need to post a new question focussing on the specific question you have an issue with. | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:05 | comment | added | Lewis Goddard | So if the older question had several answers, and the newer none, as well as being better written, you would keep the older one? *This is about a specific case now. | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:04 | vote | accept | Lewis Goddard | ||
| Jan 2, 2013 at 17:11 | history | answered | Tom Brossman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |