Skip to main content
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Source Link

A answer of mine at http://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisionshttps://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisions was edited with several additional code tags to highlight program names.

To me it makes the question look overcrowded and drowns out the actual code posted.

Is it just me or should this edit be reverted?

A answer of mine at http://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisions was edited with several additional code tags to highlight program names.

To me it makes the question look overcrowded and drowns out the actual code posted.

Is it just me or should this edit be reverted?

A answer of mine at https://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisions was edited with several additional code tags to highlight program names.

To me it makes the question look overcrowded and drowns out the actual code posted.

Is it just me or should this edit be reverted?

edited title
Link
James
  • 17.4k
  • 12
  • 5

Debating whether to Should I revert an edit (overuse of code)?

spelling mistake in title
Source Link
James
  • 17.4k
  • 12
  • 5

Debating whtherwhether to revert an edit (over useoveruse of code)

A answer of mine at http://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisions was edited with several additional code tags to highlight program names. 

To me it makes the question look overcrowded and drowns out the actual code posted.

Is it just me or should this edit be reverted?

Debating whther to revert an edit (over use of code)

A answer of mine at http://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisions was edited with several additional code tags to highlight program names. To me it makes the question look overcrowded and drowns out the actual code posted.

Is it just me or should this edit be reverted?

Debating whether to revert an edit (overuse of code)

A answer of mine at http://askubuntu.com/posts/215521/revisions was edited with several additional code tags to highlight program names. 

To me it makes the question look overcrowded and drowns out the actual code posted.

Is it just me or should this edit be reverted?

Source Link
James
  • 17.4k
  • 12
  • 5
Loading