Skip to main content
Ask Ubuntu

Return to Question

replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

ThisThis is an example.

My first reaction was to vote for closure as Not a real question, yet the title says what's wrong, and the OP gave his error message.

Therefore, it doesn't really fall in the scope of NARQ as defined in the "Close" popup:

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

Should we tolerate these questions? Or should we close them, even though we can tell what's being asked, simply to discourage badly formatted questions?

This is an example.

My first reaction was to vote for closure as Not a real question, yet the title says what's wrong, and the OP gave his error message.

Therefore, it doesn't really fall in the scope of NARQ as defined in the "Close" popup:

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

Should we tolerate these questions? Or should we close them, even though we can tell what's being asked, simply to discourage badly formatted questions?

This is an example.

My first reaction was to vote for closure as Not a real question, yet the title says what's wrong, and the OP gave his error message.

Therefore, it doesn't really fall in the scope of NARQ as defined in the "Close" popup:

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

Should we tolerate these questions? Or should we close them, even though we can tell what's being asked, simply to discourage badly formatted questions?

Source Link
SirCharlo
SirCharlo
  • 39.8k
  • 12
  • 6

Should we close questions that aren't well asked, even if it's obvious what the OP wants?

This is an example.

My first reaction was to vote for closure as Not a real question, yet the title says what's wrong, and the OP gave his error message.

Therefore, it doesn't really fall in the scope of NARQ as defined in the "Close" popup:

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

Should we tolerate these questions? Or should we close them, even though we can tell what's being asked, simply to discourage badly formatted questions?