Timeline for How do we handle edits that seem to intentionally add inflammatory language?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:34 | vote | accept | RobotHumans | ||
| Aug 28, 2012 at 8:55 | answer | added | OliMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 27, 2012 at 20:27 | history | edited | N.N. |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 27, 2012 at 16:13 | comment | added | badp | @aking1012 That's what I meant by "clarification", we thought A but the asker meant B. (This is because the edit author is the same as the question owner.) | |
| Aug 27, 2012 at 15:49 | comment | added | RobotHumans | @badp - I suppose that's possible. I read it differently after the implication of God-lessness in the initial post. | |
| Aug 27, 2012 at 15:42 | comment | added | badp | The real question there is "What is Zeitgeist? Is it something religious?" In this way, I saw the edit not as inflammatory but as revealing the real reason behind the question. | |
| Aug 27, 2012 at 15:21 | comment | added | jrg Mod | Salvage attempts are never never ever wasted, except on bug and related ones. +1 for trying. I locked it for 1 hour to give the OP a chance to calm down. | |
| Aug 27, 2012 at 15:14 | history | asked | RobotHumans | CC BY-SA 3.0 |