Timeline for What is AU's stance on profanity?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 8:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Aug 11, 2012 at 1:24 | comment | added | Mateo | Did you notice that comments that have known swears get automatically deleted when you flag them? | |
| Aug 3, 2012 at 17:29 | vote | accept | con-f-use | ||
| Aug 3, 2012 at 16:59 | comment | added | con-f-use | But it kind of renders the "family friendly" argument invalid and what remains is prohibiting people from communicating in a way that suits their personality. It is restricting free speech. And I can also explain what I want to say without using the words "but" and "loss", although that would be bereavement (and sometimes shift my meaning). | |
| Aug 3, 2012 at 16:50 | comment | added | Marco Ceppi Mod | @con-f-use that's two different subject matters. Talking about Adult Content, in this case Pornography, and actually using explicit words don't equate. As the meta post said, you can explain what you need to about an issue without using foul language. The Meta.AU question was about censoring/removing posts which talked about how to access or view Pornographic material in Ubuntu. | |
| Aug 3, 2012 at 16:36 | history | answered | jrgMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |