Timeline for Should I answer a question which already has an accepted answer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2012 at 13:20 | comment | added | nanofarad | Let's not accept it now; it is now in a comment right below. | |
| Aug 6, 2012 at 9:55 | comment | added | jokerdino Mod | @ObsessiveFOSS I don't think that edit was valid. I would have rejected it myself. The question was not about the drivers but was actually about Google Chrome. And add in the fact that the edit came in from an anon user and you have more things to consider. To be on the safe side, having no information is way better than having incorrect solution. | |
| Aug 5, 2012 at 23:51 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | I would have accepted that edit. | |
| Aug 5, 2012 at 23:38 | comment | added | nanofarad | That seems to conflict with the fact that an anonymous edit on my answer was rejected: askubuntu.com/suggested-edits/16398 | |
| Aug 5, 2012 at 19:00 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | Of course you can, that's the whole point! Why bury information in a comment when you can just fix the answer? | |
| Aug 4, 2012 at 22:53 | comment | added | nanofarad | Really? You can propose an edit on someone else's content? Would a comment also suffice if your changes aren't too sunstantial? | |
| Jul 31, 2012 at 15:45 | history | answered | Jorge Castro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |