Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

###Even a bad question can attract a lot of search engine traffic.

Even a bad question can attract a lot of search engine traffic.

That's honestly not pointed at your question but we do have a lot of poor questions that attract a surprisingly large amount of traffic, usually because they're full of the right keywords.

While this does show up what people are having problems with it's not a reflection of what people with votes are seeing as they're coming from the questions list, not Google.

###People vote for things that interest them.

People vote for things that interest them.

Now this is aimed at your question: none of the topics in your question are that sexy. And dealing with the networking aspects of X is probably considered specialist and that probably puts people off opening it, let alone voting for it.

People also have different reasons for voting up. Coherent English isn't enough for a lot of people. I personally factor in the the scale of the problem with how useful I think the answer would be to other people.

Either way, it's not your fault. It's a very subjective process and while it would be great if more people voted more, I don't think you should worry too much about making sure all your questions get +10.

###Even a bad question can attract a lot of search engine traffic.

That's honestly not pointed at your question but we do have a lot of poor questions that attract a surprisingly large amount of traffic, usually because they're full of the right keywords.

While this does show up what people are having problems with it's not a reflection of what people with votes are seeing as they're coming from the questions list, not Google.

###People vote for things that interest them.

Now this is aimed at your question: none of the topics in your question are that sexy. And dealing with the networking aspects of X is probably considered specialist and that probably puts people off opening it, let alone voting for it.

People also have different reasons for voting up. Coherent English isn't enough for a lot of people. I personally factor in the the scale of the problem with how useful I think the answer would be to other people.

Either way, it's not your fault. It's a very subjective process and while it would be great if more people voted more, I don't think you should worry too much about making sure all your questions get +10.

Even a bad question can attract a lot of search engine traffic.

That's honestly not pointed at your question but we do have a lot of poor questions that attract a surprisingly large amount of traffic, usually because they're full of the right keywords.

While this does show up what people are having problems with it's not a reflection of what people with votes are seeing as they're coming from the questions list, not Google.

People vote for things that interest them.

Now this is aimed at your question: none of the topics in your question are that sexy. And dealing with the networking aspects of X is probably considered specialist and that probably puts people off opening it, let alone voting for it.

People also have different reasons for voting up. Coherent English isn't enough for a lot of people. I personally factor in the the scale of the problem with how useful I think the answer would be to other people.

Either way, it's not your fault. It's a very subjective process and while it would be great if more people voted more, I don't think you should worry too much about making sure all your questions get +10.

Source Link
Oli Mod
  • 297.2k
  • 2
  • 147
  • 263

###Even a bad question can attract a lot of search engine traffic.

That's honestly not pointed at your question but we do have a lot of poor questions that attract a surprisingly large amount of traffic, usually because they're full of the right keywords.

While this does show up what people are having problems with it's not a reflection of what people with votes are seeing as they're coming from the questions list, not Google.

###People vote for things that interest them.

Now this is aimed at your question: none of the topics in your question are that sexy. And dealing with the networking aspects of X is probably considered specialist and that probably puts people off opening it, let alone voting for it.

People also have different reasons for voting up. Coherent English isn't enough for a lot of people. I personally factor in the the scale of the problem with how useful I think the answer would be to other people.

Either way, it's not your fault. It's a very subjective process and while it would be great if more people voted more, I don't think you should worry too much about making sure all your questions get +10.