Timeline for What is the right way to answer your own question, giving the original answer full credit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2012 at 12:22 | comment | added | N.N. | @JohnBaber I think editing works differently on meta. However, I changed the first paragraph a bit. Even if it is not completely relevant for your particular case it might be relevant for the general question you raise. | |
| Apr 9, 2012 at 12:20 | history | edited | N.N. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2012 at 11:36 | vote | accept | John Baber-Lucero | ||
| Apr 9, 2012 at 11:36 | comment | added | John Baber-Lucero | To be clear, my problem is that AZ's answer is most clear and perfect. It doesn't need any clarification. But it's nice to have a box of code that specifically addresses the exact question. However, you've hit the nail on the head with the wiki thing. I should edit AZ's answer to contain the good code at the bottom, which gives him all the points. Bingo! Hmm... can I remove the first two paragraphs of your answer? No I can't. Maybe it requires more reputation. | |
| Apr 9, 2012 at 7:36 | history | answered | N.N. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |