Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 15, 2012 at 23:49 history edited CommunityBot
insert duplicate link
Feb 15, 2012 at 23:49 history closed Bruno PereiraMod exact duplicate
Feb 10, 2012 at 1:56 comment added Knowledge Cube Possible duplicate: meta.askubuntu.com/q/1746/18612
Jan 23, 2012 at 1:41 comment added Knowledge Cube Here's another example I just ran into. The original answer was a "me too" response, but after flagging it the user deleted it, undeleted it, and edited it back into an acceptable answer. The content of the answer changed so radically there was no way edits by someone else could have improved it without changing what the answer basically said.
Jan 21, 2012 at 10:27 answer added Jeff Atwood timeline score: 2
Nov 28, 2011 at 4:41 comment added Knowledge Cube @EliahKagan Examples might include very low quality posts. Occasionally, a post might come along that looks flaggable at first glance, but you then have second thoughts about it after the fact. It is entirely possible to flag something by mistake and wish you could take it back later.
Nov 28, 2011 at 4:06 comment added Eliah Kagan If it is at all likely that a question could be improved so as not to deserve flagging, wouldn't it ordinarily deserve a downvote and explanatory comment, but not a flag, in the first place? If what a post needs is something other than moderator attention and/or deletion, why is it inappropriate to be penalized for flagging it?
Nov 28, 2011 at 2:20 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUbuntu/status/140978310678188033
Nov 23, 2011 at 17:50 comment added Knowledge Cube Questions like this make me wish I could upvote more than once. Few things are more aggravating than flagging a question, having somebody else edit it to make it more acceptable, then being penalized for the flagging because it doesn't fit the new version.
Nov 23, 2011 at 7:53 history edited N.N.
edited tags
Nov 22, 2011 at 10:23 history asked Caesium CC BY-SA 3.0