Skip to main content
improved grammar
Source Link

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .

Note: Before synonymization (if agreed) some retagging must be done to questions usingthat use the tag but should have used the tag instead.

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .

Note: Before synonymization (if agreed) some retagging must be done to questions using the tag but should have used the tag instead.

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .

Note: Before synonymization (if agreed) some retagging must be done to questions that use the tag but should have used the tag instead.

added note
Source Link

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .

Note: Before synonymization (if agreed) some retagging must be done to questions using the tag but should have used the tag instead.

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .

Note: Before synonymization (if agreed) some retagging must be done to questions using the tag but should have used the tag instead.

Became Hot Meta Post
Source Link

Should we put [wallpaper] to the [background] (or vice-versa)?

We have the and tags. The tag excerpt of the first says:

For questions regarding the image displayed on the desktop background.

The tag excerpt of the second says:

Questions about using desktop backgrounds in Ubuntu.

So the tags are essentially about the same thing, i.e. about desktop wallpapers/backgrounds.

In the past it was proposed that the tag should be burninated because it was also used for issues with background tasks/processes, which led to the creation of the tag. However, the tag is still in use for desktop backgrounds.

I suggest that should become a synonym of .