Skip to main content
Ask Ubuntu

Return to Answer

added 137 characters in body
Source Link
muru
muru
  • 204k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 67

I'd like to suggest that the tag be done away with. I propose the following criteria:

  • if the "thing" can be used by itself, or customised by itself, it might make sense to refer to it with tag - in which case we tag it with a suitable name, like , , *, (which are the names of the respective software, afaict), or, alternatively, with + .
  • if the "thing" is an inflexible component of something else, which can't be customised or used on its own, but only via the larger something else, then we should tag it with that something else - , ...

* it seems the XFCE4 Panel is called , even though neither the package nor the command uses this name.

I'd like to suggest that the tag be done away with. I propose the following criteria:

  • if the "thing" can be used by itself, or customised by itself, it might make sense to refer to it with tag - in which case we tag it with a suitable name, like , , , (which are the names of the respective software, afaict), or, alternatively, with + .
  • if the "thing" is an inflexible component of something else, which can't be customised or used on its own, but only via the larger something else, then we should tag it with that something else - , ...

I'd like to suggest that the tag be done away with. I propose the following criteria:

  • if the "thing" can be used by itself, or customised by itself, it might make sense to refer to it with tag - in which case we tag it with a suitable name, like , , *, (which are the names of the respective software, afaict), or, alternatively, with + .
  • if the "thing" is an inflexible component of something else, which can't be customised or used on its own, but only via the larger something else, then we should tag it with that something else - , ...

* it seems the XFCE4 Panel is called , even though neither the package nor the command uses this name.

Source Link
muru
muru
  • 204k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 67

I'd like to suggest that the tag be done away with. I propose the following criteria:

  • if the "thing" can be used by itself, or customised by itself, it might make sense to refer to it with tag - in which case we tag it with a suitable name, like , , , (which are the names of the respective software, afaict), or, alternatively, with + .
  • if the "thing" is an inflexible component of something else, which can't be customised or used on its own, but only via the larger something else, then we should tag it with that something else - , ...