I am new to the VLQ queue. I was met with this answer to review (as VLQ):

Why do you have two NTFS and two ext4 partitions? I'd suggest backing up all data on partitions except sda1 and sda2. Remove all partitions except sda1 and sda2 and then fill this empty space with one ext4 partition.

 

Once this is done you can boot from your installation media and proceed to install Ubuntu on to the new (should be sda3) partition created.

My first instincts said to say "Looks OK" because of the salvageable content. But I looked at the question and found that it did not answer the question. So should say "Looks OK" and then I flag it as Not an Answer?

On a second look, it has come to my attention that there is a bit of controversy on this answer - two Looks OK and one Recommended Deletion.

Link to the review

TL;DR - What should I do if VLQ is not applicable but it is still a bad answer/question?

I am new to the VLQ queue. I was met with this answer to review (as VLQ):

Why do you have two NTFS and two ext4 partitions? I'd suggest backing up all data on partitions except sda1 and sda2. Remove all partitions except sda1 and sda2 and then fill this empty space with one ext4 partition.

Once this is done you can boot from your installation media and proceed to install Ubuntu on to the new (should be sda3) partition created.

My first instincts said to say "Looks OK" because of the salvageable content. But I looked at the question and found that it did not answer the question. So should say "Looks OK" and then I flag it as Not an Answer?

On a second look, it has come to my attention that there is a bit of controversy on this answer - two Looks OK and one Recommended Deletion.

Link to the review

TL;DR - What should I do if VLQ is not applicable but it is still a bad answer/question?

I am new to the VLQ queue. I was met with this answer to review (as VLQ):

Why do you have two NTFS and two ext4 partitions? I'd suggest backing up all data on partitions except sda1 and sda2. Remove all partitions except sda1 and sda2 and then fill this empty space with one ext4 partition.

Once this is done you can boot from your installation media and proceed to install Ubuntu on to the new (should be sda3) partition created.

My first instincts said to say "Looks OK" because of the salvageable content. But I looked at the question and found that it did not answer the question. So should say "Looks OK" and then I flag it as Not an Answer?

On a second look, it has come to my attention that there is a bit of controversy on this answer - two Looks OK and one Recommended Deletion.

Link to the review: https://askubuntu.com/review/low-quality-posts/825771

TL;DR - What should I do if it is not applicable for VLQ but still is a bad answer/question?

I am new to the VLQ queue. I was met with this answer to review (as VLQ):

Why do you have two NTFS and two ext4 partitions? I'd suggest backing up all data on partitions except sda1 and sda2. Remove all partitions except sda1 and sda2 and then fill this empty space with one ext4 partition.

Once this is done you can boot from your installation media and proceed to install Ubuntu on to the new (should be sda3) partition created.

My first instincts said to say "Looks OK" because of the salvageable content. But I looked at the question and found that it did not answer the question. So should say "Looks OK" and then I flag it as Not an Answer?

On a second look, it has come to my attention that there is a bit of controversy on this answer - two Looks OK and one Recommended Deletion.

Link to the review

TL;DR - What should I do if VLQ is not applicable but it is still a bad answer/question?

I am new to the VLQ queue. I was met with this answer to review (as VLQ):

Why do you have two NTFS and two ext4 partitions? I'd suggest backing up all data on partitions except sda1 and sda2. Remove all partitions except sda1 and sda2 and then fill this empty space with one ext4 partition.

Once this is done you can boot from your installation media and proceed to install Ubuntu on to the new (should be sda3) partition created.

My first instincts said to say "Looks OK" because of the salvageable content. But I looked at the question and found that it did not answer the question. So should say "Looks OK" and then I flag it as Not an Answer?

TL;DR - What should I do if it is not applicable for VLQ but still is a bad answer/question?

I am new to the VLQ queue. I was met with this answer to review (as VLQ):

Why do you have two NTFS and two ext4 partitions? I'd suggest backing up all data on partitions except sda1 and sda2. Remove all partitions except sda1 and sda2 and then fill this empty space with one ext4 partition.

Once this is done you can boot from your installation media and proceed to install Ubuntu on to the new (should be sda3) partition created.

My first instincts said to say "Looks OK" because of the salvageable content. But I looked at the question and found that it did not answer the question. So should say "Looks OK" and then I flag it as Not an Answer?

On a second look, it has come to my attention that there is a bit of controversy on this answer - two Looks OK and one Recommended Deletion.

Link to the review: https://askubuntu.com/review/low-quality-posts/825771

TL;DR - What should I do if it is not applicable for VLQ but still is a bad answer/question?