Skip to main content
since I'm bumping by editing my answer, corrected punctuation slightly, and linked to revision you were asking about to make it clearer what was being discussed. Feel free to remove the link or roll back
Source Link
Zanna Mod
  • 71.6k
  • 3
  • 67
  • 161

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question. I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. The issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about the error message? aboutAbout one command vs another  ? areAre they asking about both  ? areAre the title and question even clear enough?

Does the community think the editthe edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule?

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question. I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. The issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about the error message? about one command vs another  ? are they asking about both  ? are the title and question even clear enough?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule?

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question. I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. The issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about the error message? About one command vs another? Are they asking about both? Are the title and question even clear enough?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule?

format update
Source Link
George Udosen
  • 37.2k
  • 9
  • 8

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question  . I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. Issue The issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about the error message  ? about one command vs another ? are they asking about both ? are the title and question even clear enough  ?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it  ?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule  ?

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question  . I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. Issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about error message  ? about one command vs another ? are they asking about both ? are the title and question even clear enough  ?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it  ?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule  ?

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question. I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. The issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about the error message? about one command vs another ? are they asking about both ? are the title and question even clear enough?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule?

added 136 characters in body
Source Link

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky commentscomments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question . I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. Issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about error message ? about one command vs another ? are they asking about both ? are the title and question even clear enough ?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it ?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule ?

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question . I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. Issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about error message ? about one command vs another ? are they asking about both ? are the title and question even clear enough ?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it ?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule ?

OK, so we have this HNQ, which gathered quite a lot of attention, snarky comments, and a small edit war between me and another user about the title of the question . I've edited the answer to match the body of the question. Issue is that it can be viewed from different points of view: is OP asking about error message ? about one command vs another ? are they asking about both ? are the title and question even clear enough ?

Does the community think the edit captures the question well enough, and if not - what should be done about it ?

PS: For the record, I think the snarky comments to that question were kinda uncalled for :) Aren't we supposed to follow "be nice" rule ?

Source Link
Loading