Return to Question

So I just had my first ever failure here in one of those tests set up by the system to check whether you're paying attention while reviewing posts.

The post in question is this: How can I uncompress a *.7z file? (a deleted answer, not the question).

It seems to me that the answerer is suggesting a website which apparently offers the service of extracting various archives (including .7z) online and lets you download the files separately.

One issue I found with the answer (like in many other posts, especially by new users) it's sounds like a forum post instead of an answer which can be corrected easily.

Another potential issue could be that the answerer was promoting their website without disclosing their affiliation (and hence a spam), but I couldn't find any apparent reason to believe that was the case.

So I okayed the post in my review queue and then found out it was already deleted as

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable – readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful.

Is this deletion justified?

So I just had my first ever failure here in one of those tests set up by the system to check whether you're paying attention while reviewing posts.

The post in question is this: How can I uncompress a *.7z file? (a deleted answer, not the question, see the screenshot below).

It seems to me that the answerer is suggesting a website which apparently offers the service of extracting various archives (including .7z) online and lets you download the files separately.

One issue I found with the answer (like in many other posts, especially by new users) it's sounds like a forum post instead of an answer which can be corrected easily.

Another potential issue could be that the answerer was promoting their website without disclosing their affiliation (and hence a spam), but I couldn't find any apparent reason to believe that was the case.

So I okayed the post in my review queue and then found out it was already deleted as

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable – readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful.

Is this deletion justified?

So I just had my first ever failure here in one of those tests set up by the system to check whether you're paying attention.

The post in question is this: How can I uncompress a *.7z file? (a deleted answer, not the question).

It seems to me that the answerer is suggesting a website which apparently offers the service of extracting various archives (including .7z) online and lets you download the files separately.

One issue I found with the answer (like in many other posts, especially by new users) it's sounds like a forum post instead of an answer which can be corrected easily.

Another potential issue could be that the answerer was promoting their website without disclosing their affiliation (and hence a spam), but I couldn't find any apparent reason to believe that was the case.

So I okayed the post in my review queue and then found out it was already deleted as

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable – readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful.

Is this deletion justified?

So I just had my first ever failure here in one of those tests set up by the system to check whether you're paying attention while reviewing posts.

The post in question is this: How can I uncompress a *.7z file? (a deleted answer, not the question).

It seems to me that the answerer is suggesting a website which apparently offers the service of extracting various archives (including .7z) online and lets you download the files separately.

One issue I found with the answer (like in many other posts, especially by new users) it's sounds like a forum post instead of an answer which can be corrected easily.

Another potential issue could be that the answerer was promoting their website without disclosing their affiliation (and hence a spam), but I couldn't find any apparent reason to believe that was the case.

So I okayed the post in my review queue and then found out it was already deleted as

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable – readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful.

Is this deletion justified?

So I just had my first ever failure here in one of those tests set up by the system to check whether you're paying attention.

The post in question is this: How can I uncompress a *.7z file? (a deleted answer, not the question).

It seems to me that the answerer is suggesting a website which apparently offers the service of extracting various archives (including .7z) online and lets you download the files separately.

One issue I found with the answer (like in many other posts, especially by new users) it's sounds like a forum post instead of an answer which can be corrected easily.

Another potential issue could be that the answerer was promoting their website without disclosing their affiliation (and hence a spam), but I couldn't find any apparent reason to believe that was the case.

So I okayed the post in my review queue and then found out it was already deleted as

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable – readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful.

Is this deletion justified?

So I just had my first ever failure here in one of those tests set up by the system to check whether you're paying attention.

The post in question is this: How can I uncompress a *.7z file? (a deleted answer, not the question).

It seems to me that the answerer is suggesting a website which apparently offers the service of extracting various archives (including .7z) online and lets you download the files separately.

One issue I found with the answer (like in many other posts, especially by new users) it's sounds like a forum post instead of an answer which can be corrected easily.

Another potential issue could be that the answerer was promoting their website without disclosing their affiliation (and hence a spam), but I couldn't find any apparent reason to believe that was the case.

So I okayed the post in my review queue and then found out it was already deleted as

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable – readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful.

Is this deletion justified?