A while ago I noticed that we have a tag lowgraphics.
This seems like a suboptimal situation. Lowgraphics isn't a even a word. If we really need a tag for that, shouldn't it be low-graphics-mode? And since we have this canonical post:
How to fix "The system is running in low-graphics mode" error?
(which doesn't have this tag, or even the graphics tag) do we really need a lowgraphics tag? Seems like the question is meant to cover all questions about "low graphics mode", so having a whole tag for one error seems overkill to me. It's like having a tag login-loop. I think we should burn it.
Edit:
In response to Kaz Wolfe's answer stating that the tag has value for questions that are actually about low graphics mode itself rather than being dupes of the canonical post, I guess only this question somewhat fits that description. If the tag were called low-graphics-mode maybe it would be easier for people to use it for that purpose, if it is actually needed. I have now retagged numerous posts that previously had this tag and are about graphics issues but not low graphics mode (the tag is being used inconsistently).
I have spent a month cleaning up this tag, and it now only has 27 posts, nearly all of which are closed, and several of which I've delete-voted (the canonical post has over 200 duplicates). Some of the posts could still be improved somewhat by editing, but I have refrained from editing them since I'm anticipating renaming the tag or untagging and I wanted to avoid bumping them twice.
What's the best thing to do about this tag?
- Leave it and fix the poorly-worded usage guidance?
- Rename it (I think this can only be done by editing the posts)?
- Burninate it (can now be done by editing the posts over a few days)?