Timeline for Why do edits need to be approved by two users?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017 at 10:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/849565306297208832 | ||
| Mar 28, 2017 at 7:51 | comment | added | Byte Commander Mod | @Fabby There you have it. | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 7:50 | answer | added | Byte CommanderMod | timeline score: 19 | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 7:14 | comment | added | Fabby | @ByteCommander I would say that classifies as an answer... | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 6:01 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | If you improve an edit, you've given it at least two looks :) | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 17:40 | comment | added | Byte Commander Mod |
I guess it's because Approve requires the reviewer just a single click and not much thought, whereas Improve Edit requires actually some work and the reviewer has to think about what they do. That way the system probably prevents robo-reviewing.
|
|
| Mar 27, 2017 at 17:18 | history | asked | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |